votevoice.org

Encouraging civic involvement

Messaging and Implementation

Overview  >  Messaging and Implementation

Voters rewarded candidates who talked about prices in concrete terms and punished those who seemed distracted or self-serving. This page applies that lesson to governing.

Lead line: Lower costs, cleaner government.

•     Two ideas, both top voter concerns, each reinforcing the other.

•     Corruption is one reason costs are high: tariffs imposed without a vote, data centers passing costs to families, insiders trading on information.

Message principles

  • Proof points over promises. Cite a specific dollar figure, bill or date every time.
  • Name the household, not the program. “A family in Ohio pays $X less for insulin this month” beats a program name.
  • Do not claim credit for prices you did not move. Global energy prices and interest rates are outside any program’s reach.

Words to use and avoid

Use Avoid Why
Lower your bills, cost of living, prices Economic jargon (GDP, CPI, soft landing) Voters judge the economy by receipts, not indicators
Accountability, checks and balances, no one above the rules Purely partisan attacks on the president About 4 in 10 Republicans want stronger checks
Secure and fair, orderly Open borders or enforcement-only language 57% say enforcement went too far, yet Republicans lead on trust
Make big tech pay its fair share Anti-technology rhetoric Voters fear AI harm but value growth
Change, results, delivered Victory laps The mandate is conditional

Who to reach, and with what

Audience Lead topics Approach
Independents and moderates Ethics reform, drug price caps, ratepayer protection, border capacity High-agreement, low-partisanship topics
Young voters Housing, child care, AI worker protections Digital channels; show results quickly
Hispanic voters Prices and wages, then immigration as order plus fairness About 7 in 10 blame current policy for the economy
Lower-income households Utility bill relief, grocery competition Trusted local messengers
Soft Republicans Corruption, congressional authority, data center costs, public safety Stress fiscal responsibility

Implementation

First 100 days of the new Congress

Pass the stock trading ban and at least one cost measure with a visible effect, such as a drug cap expansion or tariff relief on staples. Two early wins establish credibility.

A 100-day policy development plan

Days 1 to 30               Set up a cross-functional policy team, test national findings against state and district evidence, publish a baseline dashboard and fix existing programs before creating new ones.

Days 31 to 60             Draft legislative concepts with legal reviews, cost estimates and analysis of who benefits; consult state and local officials, providers, employers and experts.

Days 61 to 100           Release draft proposals with timelines, agency owners, cost ranges, beneficiaries, risks and outcome measures; take public comment and revise.

Delivery standards

  • Delivery unit: a leadership-level team tracks each program and publishes a public scorecard every quarter, including failures.
  • Budget discipline: name a funding source, give 5- and 10-year cost estimates, separate gross from net cost and avoid double-counting savings.
  • State partnerships: work with new governors and legislatures on grocery tax cuts, data center ratepayer rules and zoning reform.
  • Sequencing: start with clear legal authority; use pilots only with sunset or review dates; require inspector general review for large programs.

Risks to manage

Risk How to manage it
Overreach: only about half view the winning party favorably Lead with high-agreement measures; save divisive items for later
Veto and gridlock Use must-pass bills, bipartisan coalitions and state action; make vetoes of popular bills a visible choice
New spending fuels inflation Favor supply-side measures and pay for new spending
Oversight seen as revenge Tie every oversight effort to costs, waste or safety
External shocks from the Iran war and energy markets Build energy price contingency plans and war powers oversight into the agenda

Timeline

December 2026         Pick the two first-100-day priorities; estimate costs for all seven programs; commission district polling; begin message testing.

January 2027             Introduce the Clean Government and Accountability Act and the first cost-of-living bill.

First quarter 2027      Launch the delivery unit and public scorecard; convene governors on the state partner track.

Mid 2027                     Attach health, housing, immigration and public safety pieces to spending and reauthorization bills.

2028                            Campaign on a record of measurable delivery.

Design options

Option What it means Trade-off
Speed over scale (recommended) Smaller, targeted bills that pass in 2027. Visible wins before 2028; some goals deferred.
Scale over speed Larger packages that address problems fully. More impact if passed; may stall until 2029.
Oversight intensity Targeted, cost-linked oversight versus aggressive investigation. Targeted oversight keeps persuadable voters; aggressive oversight energizes the base but risks the margin.

Success metrics

Measure Baseline Target
Messages tested with each target audience None All five audiences by early 2027
Early wins passed in the first 100 days None At least two
Quarterly scorecard released on time None Every quarter
Proposals with full cost and funding estimates None All seven programs
District polling and listening sessions completed None Before final adoption

Sources for this page